Sydney Trade Mark Lawyer
Small Business Trade Mark Registration and Intellectual Property Protection
  • Home
  • Our Articles
    • Our Commentary
  • Quote
  • FAQs
  • About Us
    • Our People
  • Contact Us

Oops – Cadbury denied a purple trade mark in the UK

Kenneth Ti / Trade Mark / Australia, BP, IP, trade mark, Trade Marks, Trade Marks Act, UK, US /

November 4, 2013

We’ve covered this before in the past – the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Commonwealth) allows for “exotic” trade marks to be registered. These include colour marks (BP Green), shape marks (Coca-Cola bottle), sound marks (“aah, McCain, you’ve done it again… ding!”), and even scent marks (there’s only one… an eucalyptus golf tee).

Unfortunately as Cadbury found out, these exotic trade marks aren’t easily registered. They tried to apply for a colour trade mark over the colour purple, as commonly used on their wrappers. Nestle fought them over it.

In the case, the UK courts found that Cadbury’s application was unfortunately too vague as it merely described that the colour purple was predominantly used on it’s wrapping. While UK law is different to than Australian law, these are not unfamiliar concepts – and similar principles apply. Yes it is indeed possible to make an application for a colour trade mark in Australia, but it certainly is important that the application is precise, correct, and has enough evidence to support the applicant, in essence, having a monopoly over a colour, or a combination of colours.

Choosing a Suitable Trade Mark to Register – Trade Mark isn’t Identical to Existing Registered Mark

Kenneth Ti / Trade Mark / ASIC, LOGO, trade mark, trade mark registration, Trade Marks, Trade Marks Act, US /

September 6, 2013

We now come to the end of the “Choosing a Suitable Trade Mark to Register” series that we have been going through for the last few months. We certainly hope that you’ve learned a lot from this series – we certainly enjoyed writing it.

As repeatedly mentioned there are plenty of advantages in registering a trade mark. That being said, what gets registered and what doesn’t is determined by the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Commonwealth). This is one of the reasons why you have to carefully consider what your trade mark is going to be – you don’t want to use a trade mark that can’t be registered, after all!

The final “ground” for the rejection of a trade mark registration is a relatively simple one. This is contained in Section 44 of the Act. This basically says that if the application is substantially identical to or similar to an existing registration or a prior pending application, the application should be rejected unless the applicant can provide evidence that there has either been honest and concurrent use of the similar mark, or evidence that the applicant had used the mark before the existing registration or the other application. Some evidence from the applicant about how they came up with the mark as well is probably a good idea.

These can be difficult questions to answer – and not everyone documents how they have been using their trade mark! If it is indeed the case that the mark is similar or identical to another mark, it might even be a better idea to revamp or revitalise your logo – after all, if the mark is similar or identical to another mark, you would run the risk that your customers could go to your competitor, after all! A re-branding could be expensive but could be a lifesaver in the long run – and most importantly, it could help you stand out from the crowd.

If you are looking to protect your trade mark but don’t know where to start, give us a call!

Choosing a suitable Trade Mark to register – Not Confusing or Misleading

Kenneth Ti / Trade Mark / Australia, IP, trade mark, trade mark registration, Trade Marks, Trade Marks Act, US /

August 2, 2013

There are lots of advantages in registering a trade mark. If you want to protect your branding, it’s well worth the cost. That being said, not all trade marks can be registered. IP Australia, the government authority responsible for trade mark registration, is responsible at first to review the application, and consider whether a trade mark can be accepted or not.

The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Commonwealth) sets a list of situations where a trade mark can’t be registered. We have been discussing these on this blog over the last few months, and have already been through a few.

Unsurprisingly one of the reasons why IP Australia would reject an application for the registration for a trade mark is in a situation where the proposed trade mark is either to likely to “deceive or to cause confusion”.

This usually means that if a proposed trade mark looks substantially like an existing trade mark (whether registered or unregistered), then that application must be rejected. It also could mean that if a proposed trade mark gives off the impression of something that isn’t true, then that application must also be rejected. To give an example, in 1937, a company selling radios applied to have a trade mark over Disney’s Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse. Disney successfully argued that while the characters weren’t trade marks, there was the suggestion that the product was associated with Disney, when the reality was that it wasn’t.

It’s a pretty common sense approach – don’t apply for a trade mark that looks similar to your competitors, or gives the impression that you are associated with your competitors.

Keep this rule in mind when choosing a suitable Trade Mark to register. Choose carefully, and stay tuned!

Choosing a suitable Trade Mark to register – Distinguishing the Mark

Kenneth Ti / Trade Mark / Australia, Hunter Valley, IP, trade mark, Trade Marks, Trade Marks Act, US, WORD /

July 5, 2013

There are numerous advantages to registering a trade mark – it’s certainly a worthy exercise if you want to protect your branding. Not all marks can be registered though, and IP Australia, the government authority responsible for the registration of trade marks, must consider whether the mark can be registered or not.

One of the rules that IP Australia has to apply is whether the trade mark can be distinguished from others. This actually sounds harder than it actually is – put it this way. You can’t possibly try to trade mark the word “Apple” for the apples from your farm. A wine that comes from the Hunter Valley can’t possibly register a trade mark reading “Hunter Valley Wine”.

Quite simply put, a trade mark that is descriptive cannot pass this test.

The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Commonwealth) provides more guidance about what the test is. It says that trade marks that would fail consist of marks that are ordinarily used to show the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, characteristic, or the time or date of the production of the good or services.

Keep this rule in mind when choosing a suitable Trade Mark to register. Choose carefully, and stay tuned!

Changes to Intellectual Property Laws

Kenneth Ti / Trade Mark / IP, trade mark, Trade Marks, US /

June 7, 2013

On 15 April 2013 the provisions of The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012came into effect. This is a package of intellectual property laws that affect patents, trade marks, and a number of other matters.

We have previously written about this package on this blog. The new changes affect trade marks as well – particularly opposition procedures. In brief, the changes are:

  • Reduction of Notice of Opposition period to 2 months.
  • Extensions of time for a Notice of Opposition limited.
  • Streamline the procedure in relation to a Notice of Opposition.
  • Introduce two additional steps, being a Notice of Intention to defend, and a Ground of Particulars.

These changes are quite extensive and have been welcomed by a number of IP practitioners.

For more information about these new laws or how they may affect you please don’t hesitate to get in touch with our office.

«< 3 4 5 6 7 >»

Search

Categories

  • International Trade Mark (1)
  • Trade Mark (78)
    • Trade Mark Infringement (1)
      • Trade Mark Opposition (1)
    • Trade Mark Protection (3)
      • Registered Trade Mark (2)

Recent Posts

  • Honey battle causing quite a buzz February 5, 2018
  • Amending a Trade Mark September 6, 2017
  • Trade Mark Wars November 14, 2016
  • Is Timing Everything? September 26, 2016
  • The Class on Classes August 15, 2016
  • Help! I’ve received an Adverse Examination Report! July 18, 2016
  • Navigating the Trade Mark Road Bumps and Roadblocks June 14, 2016
  • From TM to R (Part 2) May 16, 2016
  • From TM to R April 18, 2016
  • Use It or Lose It March 21, 2016

Archives

Back to top

Our Details

Office Address

6/83 George Street
Parramatta NSW 2150

Postal Address

PO Box 1375
Parramatta NSW 2124

Telephone

02 9687 8885

Opening hours

Monday to Friday - 9am to 5pm

Recent Posts

  • Honey battle causing quite a buzz
  • Amending a Trade Mark
  • Trade Mark Wars
  • Is Timing Everything?
  • The Class on Classes

This website is proudly maintained by

Phang Legal

Quick Enquiry

    Your Full Name (required)

    Your Email Address (required)

    Your Phone Number (required)

    Your Message

    © Phang Legal Pty Limited

    6/83 George Street, Parramatta NSW 2150 AU
    PO Box 1375, Parramatta NSW 2124 AU
    T: +61 2 9687 8885